The 2nd respondent-insurer filed its statement of objections denying the plaint averments contending that the accident occurred due to sole negligence on the part of the deceased, who was riding the motorcycle. The owner of the vehicle though appeared through his counsel, has not filed any objections. 8,00,000/- before the District & Sessions Judge/Tribunal. Accordingly, they sought for compensation at Rs. It was further contended that the vehicle involved in the accident was insured with the 2nd respondent, therefore, both the respondents are jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation. Due to the unfortunate death of their son, they being the parents have lost the only bread earner of the family and thus due to his untimely death their future life has become dark and miserable. 40,000/- per annum from labour work and maintaining himself and his family members. They further contended that the deceased was aged about 23 years at the time of accident and he was earning Rs. 20,000/- towards funeral expenses and Rs. 10,000/- towards transportation of dead body, Rs. The parents contended that they have spent Rs. Thereby the deceased sustained injures and due to impact he was hospitalized and died while taking treatment.
#Sarojini 14th january 2016 desitv driver
KA-22/X-3473 on Gokul Road near bus stand Hubli in a moderate speed, met with an accident due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of an unknown auto rickshaw. The claimants are the parents of the deceased-Ravindra, who on at about 23.30 hours when proceeding on motor cycle bearing No. 2,82,000/- together with costs and interest at 7% per annum from the date of petition till realisation of the entire amount. 2503/2012 on the file of the VI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Belagavi awarding Rs. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed by the parents of the deceased-Ravindra for enhancement against the judgment and award dated made in MVC No.